2005-10-22, 04:02 AM
What is the deal with 352x480 resolution? Is is interlaced differently or something? Because that's muuuch taller than wide, correct?
My problem is this. I have been recording my shows in low quality, and I play them and they play fine (i.e. NOT at 352x480 resolution).
However, if I try to encode them to divx/xvid, the resulting file actually comes out at 352x480...meaning it's much taller than wide, and it's "stretched". Has anyone else had this problem?
(For the time being I'm going to try recording at medium quality, which is 720x480 I believe. Hopefully that works out for me. I'll update tomorrow...)
My problem is this. I have been recording my shows in low quality, and I play them and they play fine (i.e. NOT at 352x480 resolution).
However, if I try to encode them to divx/xvid, the resulting file actually comes out at 352x480...meaning it's much taller than wide, and it's "stretched". Has anyone else had this problem?
(For the time being I'm going to try recording at medium quality, which is 720x480 I believe. Hopefully that works out for me. I'll update tomorrow...)