I was pondering about which chipset compresses video at the highest quality. The only one I could think of is the LSI chipset from actual experience. I've owned a DVD/Hard Drive (HDD) recorder "ILO" which uses the LSI chipset for video encoding and playback. The LSI chipset kicks conexant and every other chipset in the butt when recording/playing video. For instance, my hauppauge pvr 150 card is somewhat decent but when recording high action scenes (InuYasha's BackLash Wave Technique), the video is blocky and choppy. An the transition intervals are somewhat blocky and mosquitowy looking even at high bitrates. Another drawback is no closed captioning. That really sucks. In order to improve the picture I have to buy a card with video acceleration which, by the way causes other problems. There are more detriments but i kinda tired right now.
Now on to the LSI chipset (ILO or AKA LITEON ACTUALLY) recording at the four hour mode (APPROX 2.1 Mbps) looks a little better than pvr 150 2hr mode. Transitions are far less pixelated and high action scenes are far less blocky. At least the closed caption ability was enable after a few months of nagging for the ILO.
In conclusion there should be more LSI chipset based video capture pci cards on the market than any conexent chipset based cards. My opinion
best of fortune
Now on to the LSI chipset (ILO or AKA LITEON ACTUALLY) recording at the four hour mode (APPROX 2.1 Mbps) looks a little better than pvr 150 2hr mode. Transitions are far less pixelated and high action scenes are far less blocky. At least the closed caption ability was enable after a few months of nagging for the ILO.
In conclusion there should be more LSI chipset based video capture pci cards on the market than any conexent chipset based cards. My opinion
best of fortune
![Cool Cool](https://forums.nextpvr.com/images/smilies/cool.png)