NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums General General Discussion v
« Previous 1 … 30 31 32 33 34 … 159 Next »
Wow Cable

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Wow Cable
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 52,772
Threads: 954
Joined: May 2006
#1
2011-04-01, 03:48 AM
I read a positive post (via the SageTV forums) showing some potential benefits for American NPVR users who subscribe to Wow as their cable provider. It seems their basic tier is going to clear QAM http://www.thewowbuzz.com/blog/technolog...-revisited good news in itself but as a bonuse from the sample there seems to be a lot of multi-rec functionality.

As a Canadian with no clear QAM of note I am jealous.

Martin
pcostanza
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 3,778
Threads: 270
Joined: Oct 2004
#2
2011-04-01, 02:31 PM
Quote: But many customers correctly pointed out that newer sets with digital QAM tuner capabilities could tune the signals directly if they were unencrypted. This approach would save customers lease fees for DTA equipment, and save WOW! the capital expense of deploying that same equipment in many cases.

In light of customer feedback on this issue, our executive team revisited various issues surrounding the encryption of digital content
Wow (pun intended) imagine a company that is interested in customer feedback!
I'm a monthly Cox 'Town Hall' survey taker. They send me a survey each month and ask me questions and I am extremely vocal and honest. They have actually instituted some of the tiny things we've talked about but I can't see them doing away with boxes though I would think that would still save them lots of money.

Never heard of Wow and think they must be in the smaller markets. I am envious too.


Paul


Custom ASUS Maximus X Hero, 16 GB Memory-ASUS GeForce 1050 Ti, H115i Pro AIO, 850W PS, CM H500P case, Corsair Vengeance RGB Ram, Samsung 970 EVO, HDHomerun Prime & Extend  Tuners- running Windows 10 (and other goodies)
mikeh49
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,129
Threads: 81
Joined: Apr 2005
#3
2011-04-01, 02:42 PM
Note though that these channels are in SD, 480i. This is discussed in some of the blog comments. Depending on which TV/PC I'm viewing the channel on, Charter's 480i is mediocre, and variable. The local sub-channels tend to be pretty poor, but the "real" cable channels are OK. Still, SDTV looks best on an analog CRT TV, IMO.

Nevertheless, pretty remarkable for a cable company. Charter would never think of this.
HTPC: Optiplex 7010, HDHR Prime/Avermedia Duet A188, NPVR 4.2.5, Win10 Pro
Test:
re-Barr
Offline

Member

Posts: 119
Threads: 10
Joined: Jun 2009
#4
2011-04-03, 03:51 AM
true that, Mike, Charter's website says that they comply with the FCC mandate to retransmit local affiliates but that they are not required so they don't post channel availability which varies from market to market. Sounds like they wish it would just go away. I think that wow should be applauded for using the clear QAM to broadcast the basic tier. Seems odd though that they would make it SD only... Seems like they could save the bandwidth and cost by doing it HD only.
__________
[SIZE="1"]Dell Optiplex GX280; P4 2.8GHz; 1GB RAM; XP Pro SP3; Hauppauge HVR-1600; nVidia 7600GS;
NPVR 2.1.5; System[/SIZE]
mian
Offline

Member

Posts: 217
Threads: 29
Joined: Aug 2005
#5
2011-04-03, 04:32 AM
I hope that catches on. Even with just SD, as OP said, multi-rec alone could sell it.

Quote: I can't see them doing away with boxes though I would think that would still save them lots of money.

I'm sure as soon Amazon loses kindle DRM, the cable companies will lose their boxes (okay, maybe not that soon). DRM never works, but they keep ramping up investments -- the bigger the failures to preventing theft, the more inconvenience to paying customers, the more convinced they are it's the answer to everything. DRM developers are the evil spawn of the best snake oil salesmen the world ever knew. They're making millions of consumers fund their hocus pocus with absolutely no say in the matter.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Rogers/Shaw cable STB migration mvallevand 14 2,168 2024-08-25, 12:19 PM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Question about a cable card RTKAT 9 4,769 2015-12-12, 12:15 AM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Cable television from ethenet? GrimLoke 0 1,691 2014-11-19, 03:18 PM
Last Post: GrimLoke
  FCC to allow U.S. basic cable to be encrypted mian 22 9,613 2013-09-26, 03:55 AM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Life After GBPVR - A Cautionary Tale of Moving to a Cable Company DVR bdgbill 2 2,546 2013-06-01, 11:34 PM
Last Post: mvallevand
  US Cable subscribers will get his in the pocket book again soon pcostanza 3 2,328 2012-12-15, 09:59 PM
Last Post: kayphoonstar
  Converting Cable Box EPG to XML EPG Schedules for NPVR? jksmurf 14 6,757 2012-11-08, 06:08 PM
Last Post: Graham
  Multicard setup with cable boxes PatM 3 2,007 2012-03-15, 02:08 PM
Last Post: PatM
  Virgin Media cable broadband. Max internal length for cable runs? bgowland 5 4,062 2011-09-30, 11:42 PM
Last Post: ACTCMS
  Fun and games with Time Warner Cable soccerdad 9 4,365 2011-09-08, 11:07 PM
Last Post: smajor

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode