NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public NextPVR Support Legacy (v4.x and earlier) v
« Previous 1 … 337 338 339 340 341 … 433 Next »
Slow / delayed resume after skipping while paused

Slow / delayed resume after skipping while paused
BigMoose
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 838
Threads: 44
Joined: Jan 2008
#11
2011-07-08, 08:33 AM
Mine is far from "not too bad" - this is general skipping of HD recordings, not just from a pause. As I say, sometimes the only thing for it is to exit and resume playback. Annoyingly it's intermittent and seems more likely to do it when the wife is watching something than when I have the machine to myself to play around!
Bathman
Offline

Member

Posts: 238
Threads: 51
Joined: Dec 2004
#12
2011-07-16, 06:46 AM
I've found skipping to be poor ever since I switched to NPVR.

In fact the pause after I press the skip button is that long I now no longer skip through the adverts.

The skipping problem only occurs with TV Recordings and Live TV. Divx and DVD are fine.

Is it a TS problem?
MSI FA-4 speedster, Pentium M 2.0, 2 gig memory ,nvidia 210, Samsung Ecogreen 1.5 Terabyte Hard Drive
Reddwarf
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 6,629
Threads: 230
Joined: Mar 2007
#13
2011-07-16, 03:05 PM
Bathman Wrote:The skipping problem only occurs with TV Recordings and Live TV. Divx and DVD are fine.
Is it a TS problem?


I'v found that a short skip (forward or backwards) helps when npvr hangs after skipping. Have you tried it?

"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
imilne
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 2,423
Threads: 135
Joined: Feb 2008
#14
2011-07-16, 03:27 PM
With GBPVR you could just go clickity clickity clickity and skip as fast as you could press buttons on your remote, and even if the video couldn't keep up you could always see your position in the timeline. NPVR just doesn't seem to be able to do that. Hopefully things will improve though.

Iain
griffy
Offline

Member

Posts: 138
Threads: 15
Joined: Nov 2008
#15
2011-07-17, 05:55 AM
Surprised that SUB didn't port the TS player across as GB-PVR was/is working 100%
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,708
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#16
2011-07-17, 06:17 AM
griffy Wrote:Surprised that SUB didn't port the TS player across as GB-PVR was/is working 100%
I have to laugh when I see comments like this. Rose coloured memories of things were generally considered crappy at the time...

When I was still working on GBPVR, people were continually complaining about it's crappy TS playback (for example, it was never able to get the duration or skipping anywhere near accurate (relied on guessing from the bitrate)). I think people have either have selective memories. I'm not claiming the current TS playback is perfect, but I'd rate it as a lot better than GBPVR's in lots of ways.
BigMoose
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 838
Threads: 44
Joined: Jan 2008
#17
2011-07-17, 07:41 AM
Reddwarf Wrote:I'v found that a short skip (forward or backwards) helps when npvr hangs after skipping. Have you tried it?

This is what I do and it mostly solves the problem. Sometimes not and I end up exiting and resuming playback. I'm also fairly sure it's only live TV and recordings that this happens with. Would logs from when it happens show anything useful?
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#18
2011-07-17, 08:14 AM
Sub,

.ts playback in NPVR is indeed far superior to GB-PVR. I'm sure most people who felt playback and skipping was oh-so-perfect in gb-pvr were actually using the DVR-MS mux or one of the MPEG muxes. I used DVR-MS, with which skipping and comskip were nearly perfect. You've VASTLY improved .ts playback and skipping since the GB-PVR days, but it's still not as good as DVR-MS was. In particular, .ts still seems much less tolerant of a less-than-perfect bitstream than DVR-MS. I know there are technical reasons why that is the case, and that improvements are not trivial.

I still think there is something not quite right with your code in regards to the skip timing. Just after you introduced the timing.info and made a couple of patches to fix a few things, you had it just about perfect. 10 seconds skips were precisely 10 seconds in either direction. Now forward skips are around 3 seconds too long, backwards skips the same amount too short. Comskip jump points are also off by similar amounts, but it seems more unpredicatable lately (so the adjustments afforded by the comskip offset parameters you added are not as helpful as they initially were). Lately I have had more trouble getting a really good, clean signal, so some of the more random behavior I've been seeing may be due to that.

I'm wondering if you've put any more thought or effort into an idea we talked about in a thread quite awhile back, of making jumps only to I-frames. I suspect that some of the problems people have with skipping acting funny are caused by the decoders not always handling jumps into the middle of a frame sequence and hitting a bunch of P- or B-frames before getting a proper I-frame. I think, but certainly am not sure, that this is what causes it to just freeze sometimes after a skip, or to resume playback in choppy slow-motion.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 52,940
Threads: 956
Joined: May 2006
#19
2011-07-17, 12:39 PM
The skip values NPVR send mvpmcx2 are exactly what I expect to see and it is working very well. However I have noticed in several of BrettB's logs that the first Timing.Info value is not always valid and I had to adjust for it.

If you look at this recent example he looks to be streaming at about 16 Mbs but the Timing.Info includes some start up time. Without adjust all skips on this file would be about 6.5 seconds off.

Code:
0,0
6349,503088
7207,3437768
8065,5282424
8938,7127080
9796,8971736
10670,10313304
...

Martin
BrettB
Offline

Posting Freak

Saint Paul, MN, USA
Posts: 2,667
Threads: 170
Joined: Jun 2007
#20
2011-07-17, 03:34 PM
mvallevand Wrote:If you look at this recent example he looks to be streaming at about 16 Mbs but the Timing.Info includes some start up time. Without adjust all skips on this file would be about 6.5 seconds off.
Martin

This is a VERY INTERESTING observation, Martin. And, since different tuners (maybe even different channels on the same tuner?) have different startup times, it would also explain why the offset parameter values we need to set are different for different recordings!
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (8): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 8 Next »
Jump to page 


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  tsreader4 skipping issues dlindyds 63 14,209 2021-09-05, 03:23 AM
Last Post: rizarefaldi
Photo video in recordings slow to display jimbojones 7 2,767 2020-04-02, 10:37 PM
Last Post: jimbojones
  Constant Sleep Resume Cycle mikeh49 2 1,261 2020-02-02, 07:57 PM
Last Post: mikeh49
  Issue with Beast IPTV recording - Skipping + Doesn't record full show abrupt ending russmehta01 3 3,019 2019-02-26, 09:20 PM
Last Post: sub
  Slow motion on live tv rosario04 17 3,706 2019-02-18, 01:39 AM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Slow to start playback nightsbird 8 2,267 2019-01-17, 02:39 AM
Last Post: nightsbird
  Disable recurring recording slow on host, locks client drmargarit 0 895 2018-12-10, 01:24 AM
Last Post: drmargarit
  Npvr not skipping comskip break points glb1945 3 1,364 2018-11-18, 01:51 AM
Last Post: ga_mueller
  program crashes on playback resume marc 5 2,192 2018-10-06, 12:09 PM
Last Post: marc
  Read Rate too slow for continuous playback hootie318 6 2,163 2018-08-03, 08:17 AM
Last Post: Graham

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode