2023-02-09, 12:55 PM
(2023-01-30, 08:05 PM)mvallevand Wrote: Perhaps add the -re option so ffmpeg knows it is realtime. That does seem slower than my experience, however tuning my STB can also be slow too so if that is in your test it is possible.. As long as it gets consistent 1x speed the PC shouldn't make a different. My cheap grabbers had trouble going for a hour though.
Also make sure you are testing with a direct play client too, the browser test will always be slower. In direct play the time from NextPVR shouldn't be too much different then the batch test to ffplay.
Martin
Are there any options for IR tranceiver that might work that are available on Amazon? I've tried finding one, but everything is just for IR repeaters. I currently am using the HD PVR 2 just for it's IR blasting capabilities but am wondering why there are so few options for IR tranceivers (iguanablast and UIRT are all I've found). My DVR's ethernet port is disabled so there is no way to http change channels, but I do have several IoT IR blasters that I could possibly try to utilize with webhooks to send IR codes to. I would like to return the HD PVR 2 since it is fairly expensive for what it does, and over 10 years old tech now. I was able to change channels with this as my extras file:
<extras>
<channel name="{channel-name}">
<command>cmd</command>
<args> /c haupblast.exe {channel} | ffmpeg -f dshow -rtbufsize 100M -i video="USB3.0HD vid eo":audio="Digital Audio Interface (USB Digital Audio)" -c:v h264_qsv -b:v 8M -c:a aac -f mpegts - </args>
</channel>
</extras>