2007-10-22, 01:21 AM
Hi,
First time post!
I've been reading and experimenting for the last few weeks, and i'm ALMOST there.
I have 2 x Hauppauge Nova-T-500 (so 4 x tuners in total).
Everything is tuned in, working and recording perfectly.
The only problem I have is with the DivX conversion quality.
It's just not up to the standard of other programs i've used, such as AutoGK or Dr. DivX, even if I increase the bitrate in the config.xml to ~1300.
The standard response to this seems to be 'use XviD', but i'm afraid this isn't an option, as the completed videos are going to be imported into a management system that only supports DivX (long story).
I've looked up the command line options for FFMPEG but there doesn't seem to be anything useful to me.
Can anyone tell me why the DivX movies converted using this process with 1300kbps looks so much worse than using one of the other above mentioned programs with 780kbps?
First time post!
I've been reading and experimenting for the last few weeks, and i'm ALMOST there.
I have 2 x Hauppauge Nova-T-500 (so 4 x tuners in total).
Everything is tuned in, working and recording perfectly.
The only problem I have is with the DivX conversion quality.
It's just not up to the standard of other programs i've used, such as AutoGK or Dr. DivX, even if I increase the bitrate in the config.xml to ~1300.
The standard response to this seems to be 'use XviD', but i'm afraid this isn't an option, as the completed videos are going to be imported into a management system that only supports DivX (long story).
I've looked up the command line options for FFMPEG but there doesn't seem to be anything useful to me.
Can anyone tell me why the DivX movies converted using this process with 1300kbps looks so much worse than using one of the other above mentioned programs with 780kbps?