NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 389 390 391 392 393 … 1231 Next »
padding and scheduling

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
padding and scheduling
fluffykeith
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 398
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2007
#1
2008-01-06, 10:17 AM
Two things:
1.
Ive noticed a few threads with padding issues but they all seem to imply slightly different scenarios.

I can't determine any consistent problem with the padding however I do see that the length of the recording as displayed when viewing the OSD does not exactly match the program length plus the padding, it can vary by a few minutes either way.

Could this be due to the encoding, I am guessing here, but mpeg uses key frames and differences from one frame to the next (very simply put!). The key frames (I-frames) may have to be at the ends of the file and if they are minutes apart then we will see this effect and for some people it wil look like padding is missing.
I believe this does not have to be the case as I never encountered it with my previous PVR.


I have the multi-tuner patch dated 13/11/07 12:44
and the settings in the config
<PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>false</PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>
<TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>true</TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>


2.
The scheduling of recordings seems very inflexible when it comes to choosing tuners.
Example, Tuner A can receive programs 1, 2 and Tuner B can receive programs 1, 3.
If I schedule a recording for program 1 it may be scheduled to tuner A.
If I then schedule a recording for program 2 it can't be recorded, even though tuner B is idle.
It would be good if the programs were shuffled to record 1 or tuner B and 2 on tuner A.
I know there are difficult cases, overlapping recordings etc etc but even if it only did this for the simple case it would be a great help.

3.
Is there any indication on pending and ready recodings as to which tuner was used. It would help a great deal in sorting out tuner related problems. Possibly even some was to force a tuner to be used for pending recordings to improve the situation in 2.

Sorry this sounds more like a wish list now. Wink

cheers

Keith
Old broken setup - Zalman HD160+ box,  AMD Athlon 5400+, 3GB DDR2, Motherboard Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
Hauppauge Nova-T PCI
Hauppauge Nova-S PCI
BlackGold Dual T2, S2 PCI
1x 2TB SATA
Windows 7 Pro
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#2
2008-01-06, 03:54 PM
Quote:1.
Ive noticed a few threads with padding issues but they all seem to imply slightly different scenarios.

I can't determine any consistent problem with the padding however I do see that the length of the recording as displayed when viewing the OSD does not exactly match the program length plus the padding, it can vary by a few minutes either way.
If you post the logs that show the recording occurring, then I'll tell you whether included padding, and if doesnt then why.

Quote:3.
Is there any indication on pending and ready recodings as to which tuner was used. It would help a great deal in sorting out tuner related problems.
No there isnt. GB-PVR decides what tuner to use, and can often change its mind at the very last moment.

Quote:Possibly even some was to force a tuner to be used for pending recordings to improve the situation in 2
Sorry, I have no plans to add this in future.
martint123
Offline

Posting Freak

UK, East Yorkshire
Posts: 4,658
Threads: 208
Joined: Nov 2005
#3
2008-01-06, 04:19 PM
Ref your (1), I am now running all my recordings from my nova-t-500 through videoredo and doing a QSF to solve timeline oddities. I'm slowly working through different mux's to see if this helps, but so far all do it. Maybe in a couple of years time when analogue gets switched off here and the transmitter increases DVB power things might get better.
Another was this shows up for me is forward skipping through ads, at around the 45 minute adverts, forward skips often actually goes backwards unless QSF has been run.

Martin
fluffykeith
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 398
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2007
#4
2008-01-07, 07:20 PM
QSF - is that the quick fix in videoredo.
I played with the demo version for converting some dvr-ms files to mpeg and some basic edits - its very quick.

I found the forward skip and pause and play often go back in time, presumably to a key frame or something - I think that functionality is a bit quirky and annoying.

Also I want configurable fast forward steps - even keeping my finger on the remote button it takes ages.

Keith
Old broken setup - Zalman HD160+ box,  AMD Athlon 5400+, 3GB DDR2, Motherboard Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
Hauppauge Nova-T PCI
Hauppauge Nova-S PCI
BlackGold Dual T2, S2 PCI
1x 2TB SATA
Windows 7 Pro
fluffykeith
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 398
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2007
#5
2008-01-07, 07:27 PM
Sub - are the pending recordings updated with an new EPG?

Keith
Old broken setup - Zalman HD160+ box,  AMD Athlon 5400+, 3GB DDR2, Motherboard Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
Hauppauge Nova-T PCI
Hauppauge Nova-S PCI
BlackGold Dual T2, S2 PCI
1x 2TB SATA
Windows 7 Pro
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#6
2008-01-07, 07:29 PM
fluffykeith Wrote:Sub - are the pending recordings updated with an new EPG?
I'm thingk this is what you mean... new pending recordings are created when the EPG is updated.
fluffykeith
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 398
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2007
#7
2008-01-07, 08:02 PM
Sorry about that it wasn't very clear - I mean if there are existing pending recordings scheduled and then a new EPG is loaded and changes have been made to the EPG are the existing pending recordings adjusted to match the new EPG.

Also when adding a new season recording it can take a long time to add the items.

(BTW - my system has been stable for 3 days!! - I reinstalled Searchwiz plugin and also disabled comskip - might be coincedence though!)

cheers

Keith
Old broken setup - Zalman HD160+ box,  AMD Athlon 5400+, 3GB DDR2, Motherboard Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
Hauppauge Nova-T PCI
Hauppauge Nova-S PCI
BlackGold Dual T2, S2 PCI
1x 2TB SATA
Windows 7 Pro
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#8
2008-01-07, 08:07 PM
fluffykeith Wrote:I mean if there are existing pending recordings scheduled and then a new EPG is loaded and changes have been made to the EPG are the existing pending recordings adjusted to match the new EPG.
When it does the EPG update it deletes all pending episodes of a season recording, then imports the EPG, then reschedules any season recording episodes based on the EPG data that exists, so yes - season recordings episodes should reflect any schedule changes.

The only exception is the very first recording in a season recording, ie the one that was used to create the season recording. This special case is not deleted before the EPG update.

Quote:Also when adding a new season recording it can take a long time to add the items.
Its pretty much instant here unless you happen to do a season recording on a show that has a couple of hundred episodes (like "Paid Programming" on home shopping channel), or if the recording service isnt running (in which case there is a communication timeout that happens after recoridng is scheduled).
martint123
Offline

Posting Freak

UK, East Yorkshire
Posts: 4,658
Threads: 208
Joined: Nov 2005
#9
2008-01-07, 08:20 PM
fluffykeith Wrote:QSF - is that the quick fix in videoredo.

I found the forward skip and pause and play often go back in time, presumably to a key frame or something - I think that functionality is a bit quirky and annoying.

Also I want configurable fast forward steps - even keeping my finger on the remote button it takes ages.

Keith


QSF - yes the quick stream fix, works a treat

Ref the fast forward - you do realise you can do something like 15 ffwd and it will go forward 15 minutes - likewise backwards.
fluffykeith
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 398
Threads: 69
Joined: Nov 2007
#10
2008-01-07, 09:05 PM
martint123 Wrote:Ref the fast forward - you do realise you can do something like 15 ffwd and it will go forward 15 minutes - likewise backwards.

Ah - thanks - I did read something about that but not tried, more buttons for the lazy person like me!! I'll give it a try.

cheers

keith
Old broken setup - Zalman HD160+ box,  AMD Athlon 5400+, 3GB DDR2, Motherboard Gigabyte GA-M61P-S3
Hauppauge Nova-T PCI
Hauppauge Nova-S PCI
BlackGold Dual T2, S2 PCI
1x 2TB SATA
Windows 7 Pro
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Web Scheduling Not Working hasso 1 1,895 2011-06-28, 10:48 AM
Last Post: hasso
  Pre Padding fails for 10pm recordings (starts late instead of early) Stereodude 5 2,279 2010-09-23, 04:32 PM
Last Post: sub
  PVRX2: negative padding bungle 4 2,174 2010-04-24, 01:59 AM
Last Post: sub
  scheduling changes not handled well? johnsonx42 48 13,496 2010-04-22, 08:33 AM
Last Post: thawk
  Post-show padding sometimes inhibits ADS metadata cb123 0 1,189 2010-04-01, 03:23 PM
Last Post: cb123
  explicitly specified padding not honored johnsonx42 10 3,390 2010-03-09, 10:24 PM
Last Post: mvallevand
  GBPVR scheduling recording more than once jldet5 11 3,795 2009-12-25, 12:10 PM
Last Post: XJW
  Web Scheduling password problem StevHodge 0 1,160 2009-12-21, 06:52 PM
Last Post: StevHodge
  GBPVR not scheduling PC to wake up from Sleep twinfrey 1 1,265 2009-11-29, 02:22 AM
Last Post: sub
  Multi Recording Padding Not Working hasso 42 12,657 2009-09-29, 03:21 AM
Last Post: griffy

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode