2005-03-16, 02:06 PM
Just getting opinions...
Which software MPEG-2 decoder has the best visual quality?
Which has the lowest CPU usage?
Since there's a lot to choose from, I wanted to get people's opinions. I'd like to use a decoder that has the lowest CPU usage possible with GBPVR (without sacrificing too much visual quality), since my hardware is limited. SSE support would be a bonus. System CPU is a Tualatin-core Celeron 1.3GHz with 384MB of RAM (soon to be 512MB, the system's max), video card is an onboard Matrox MGA-200 AGP (drivers identify it as a Matrox Mystique) with 8MB of RAM, running XP Pro SP2. This is a budget box built from a small Sony VAIO minitower, its advantages being a lot of cool things already built in, small size, and low noise --oh, and that it fit my budget, much of it being free. Until I have it set up to make better use of my Sigma Designs XCard, I need the best software solution for playback.
Your thoughts are appreciated.
Which software MPEG-2 decoder has the best visual quality?
Which has the lowest CPU usage?
Since there's a lot to choose from, I wanted to get people's opinions. I'd like to use a decoder that has the lowest CPU usage possible with GBPVR (without sacrificing too much visual quality), since my hardware is limited. SSE support would be a bonus. System CPU is a Tualatin-core Celeron 1.3GHz with 384MB of RAM (soon to be 512MB, the system's max), video card is an onboard Matrox MGA-200 AGP (drivers identify it as a Matrox Mystique) with 8MB of RAM, running XP Pro SP2. This is a budget box built from a small Sony VAIO minitower, its advantages being a lot of cool things already built in, small size, and low noise --oh, and that it fit my budget, much of it being free. Until I have it set up to make better use of my Sigma Designs XCard, I need the best software solution for playback.
Your thoughts are appreciated.