NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 … 1231 Next »
Win 2000 or XP?

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Win 2000 or XP?
janlovik
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 16
Threads: 2
Joined: Feb 2005
#1
2005-04-29, 10:57 AM
I have bought some new hardware, and are planning to do a clean OS and GB-PVR install. I will use the computer for GB-PVR only.

Currently I am using Win 2000 professional, but I also have XP Professional. Are there any views on which OS I should use for my GB-PVR box? Are there any advantages of using XP instead of Win 2000?
reven
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,782
Threads: 396
Joined: Sep 2004
#2
2005-04-29, 11:13 AM
i would use win xp, just turn off all the pretty stuff to speed it up, its easier to set up with gbpvr.
onestar
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 252
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2005
#3
2005-04-29, 12:55 PM
janlovik Wrote:I have bought some new hardware, and are planning to do a clean OS and GB-PVR install. I will use the computer for GB-PVR only.

Currently I am using Win 2000 professional, but I also have XP Professional. Are there any views on which OS I should use for my GB-PVR box? Are there any advantages of using XP instead of Win 2000?


Personally my own opinion is 2K. Think its more stable than XP, faster than XP. Thats my view, if I didn't have to install XP pro for Pinnacle Mediacenter, I would have stuck with 2K definately. Still thinking about going back.
Atomike
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 46
Threads: 21
Joined: Jan 2005
#4
2005-04-29, 04:42 PM
Onestar is the first person I've ever heard who said 2000 was more stable. I've heard exactly the opposite. From what I've read, XP was built on 2000 - simply adding new, better, faster features.
But I'm not a programmer.
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,823
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#5
2005-04-29, 04:47 PM
I prefer XP. XP is rock solid for me.
onestar
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 252
Threads: 42
Joined: Mar 2005
#6
2005-04-29, 06:19 PM
tipstir Wrote:Windows 2000 Professional and Windows XP Professional basically are the same except for:

Graphical: - XP Wins
Speed: - XP Wins
Memory: - XP Wins
Out of the Box Hookup with today's devices: - XP Wins

I'd have to take issue with the graphics. They feel like they are out of toytown. Speed..nah,
memory...more,
last part probably true, although I have a USB2 device it won't recognise, that W2K never showed as question mark.

And I hate its "let me lead you by the hand" mentallity. ooo ooo your drive is nearly full, it is really, honest, I know you know, but I better remind you again, oh and again....incase you forgot arrrrghhh. (regedit to fix)
capone
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,756
Threads: 190
Joined: Jan 2005
#7
2005-04-29, 07:14 PM
2k will require less overhead for memory/resources, but XP will get more multimedia attention as time goes on. It will also be supported better as time goes on, and you never know what new plugin will need the lastest and greatest.

If you have > 1.75Ghz/512Mb, and like keeping your growth options open, then you may as well go XP.
Spartan
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 457
Threads: 28
Joined: Mar 2005
#8
2005-04-29, 08:47 PM
tipstir Wrote:Windows Server 2003 Standard - Some say you can run GBPVR on it, might give it a try with it..? Much quicker than any Windows OS Server so far though.

See my sig. Cool
GBPVR v1.0.16 | Comskip | SportsScores | Weather | I-XmlTV

Server: Tyan Thunder h1000E | 2 x Opteron 2210 | 2GB PC2-5300 DDR2 ECC
LSI MegaRAID 300-8X SATA RAID
1x 73GB SCSI @ 10K RPM (OS)
3x 500GB SATA @ 7.2K RPM (RAID 5) (4 Partitions: Docs, Still Pics, Home Movies, Music)
2x 160GB IDE @ 7.2K RPM (RAID 0) (Recordings)
Hauppauge HVR-1600

Client: Gigabyte GA-MA69GM-S2H | Athlon x2 5000+ BE | 2GB PC-6400 DDR2
1x 320GB SATA @ 7.2K RPM
Antec NSX2480 Case
MCE Remote
KingArgyle
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,271
Threads: 95
Joined: Nov 2004
#9
2005-04-29, 08:52 PM
Personally, I prefer 2K over XP. I have GBPVR running on a 2K machine with 256Meg, and it runs rock solid. Only time that system has been rebooted in the last several months is when there was a power failure. Can't say the same about the Win XP Pro SP2 machine that we have, it is constantly needing to be rebooted.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  PVRX2 Windows 2000, possible? D.R. 7 2,251 2008-01-27, 03:22 PM
Last Post: sub
  Any advantages from switching from windows 2000 server to Windows MCE 2005? esimko 3 1,523 2007-05-19, 06:09 PM
Last Post: linene
  INFO: Software Requirements for a Windows 2000 Install steves 0 1,340 2007-05-18, 01:13 PM
Last Post: steves
  I need WinTV 2000 for gbpvr to work waveking 10 2,392 2007-03-27, 01:01 PM
Last Post: whurlston
  GBPVR on Win-2000 Reddwarf 14 3,182 2007-03-18, 03:54 PM
Last Post: pvrtinkerer
  Winfast PVR 2000 and Vista. Bad Combo, or me stupid? jtymann 0 1,095 2007-02-26, 06:32 AM
Last Post: jtymann
  Windows 2000 help pvrgb 1 1,118 2006-05-26, 04:46 PM
Last Post: sub
  yes!! yes !!yes!! and no no no winfast 2000 xp deluxe terramir 0 1,125 2006-03-16, 04:18 AM
Last Post: terramir
  Scientific Atlanta Explorer 2000 shink 2 1,401 2005-10-14, 12:02 PM
Last Post: spaceghost
  WinTV 2000 vs. GBPVR bdlamprecht 1 1,800 2005-02-12, 04:25 AM
Last Post: rtiangha

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode