NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Wishlist v
« Previous 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 193 Next »
Controlling ffdshow

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Controlling ffdshow
7ore
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 598
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2006
#1
2010-12-10, 09:48 PM
It would be cool if there where a way to control ffdshow from within NextPVR.
Like changing audiostream or turning Subtitles on, off or switching between them.

I've benn looking for a way to let my remote control ffdshow in the background and maybe I succeed. But it would be nice if it were possible to do directly from within npvr.
I found this page with code examples for the ffdshow API
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 53,191
Threads: 958
Joined: May 2006
#2
2010-12-11, 01:54 AM
This is a good idea I will look into it. I am a big fan of ffdshow and NPVR and anything I can do to improve this relationship and getting more people onboard helps. One of GBPVR and NPVR weaknesses (and strengthes at times) is the reliance on installed DS components and when you look at how the competition (MythTV, XBMC, SageTV, MPC-HD, MP, SageTV) use ffdshow or ffmpeg to me it makes a lot of sense to keep in this direction

Martin
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#3
2010-12-11, 06:11 AM
Agreed; being able to use various decoders is very nice, but having a standard decoder that works for the majority and that the program knows how to interface with would be most welcome. It would be particularly helpful to new users, who don't understand the whole decoder thing.

Hoborg has put in a lot of effort with his SAF package, and I gather it works well for many users. I've never explicitly steered users towards it for two reasons: 1) I generally am wary of 'black-box' solutions for this sort of thing - you don't learn anything by installing it, and don't really know what all it does. 2) it appears to depend on being *unlocked* which I gather means a commercial decoder gets provided somehow on the sly. So hoborg's work is good and is to be applauded, but I don't think it can be made the official go-to solution for NPVR.

By the way, a quick question, when we say "ffdshow" do we mean "ffdshow-tryouts" or is there another version/fork of ffdshow that I don't know about? I'm not being picky or suggesting it has to be called by full name every time, I just want to make sure ffdshow-tryouts is what "ffdshow" means in 2010.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 53,191
Threads: 958
Joined: May 2006
#4
2010-12-11, 06:24 AM
ffdshow development stopped many years ago so yes I mean tryouts.

Martin
7ore
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 598
Threads: 68
Joined: Mar 2006
#5
2010-12-11, 07:02 AM
I meant tryouts as well.
Awesome initiative, Martin! Send me a PM if you come to the point you need a tester for it. Smile
Reddwarf
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 6,629
Threads: 230
Joined: Mar 2007
#6
2010-12-17, 02:26 AM
7ore Wrote:I meant tryouts as well.
Awesome initiative, Martin! Send me a PM if you come to the point you need a tester for it. Smile

What about all of us that never had any sucess using ffdshow? I'v tried SAF and various builds of ffdshow tryouts but never managed to get both audio and video at the same time. My feeling about the project is that it is abandond and every Joe, Dick and Harry's dog have their own version of ffdshow so there is no reliable development going on.

"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 53,191
Threads: 958
Joined: May 2006
#7
2010-12-17, 03:14 AM
I don't agree ffdshow-tryout is an active project on soureforge which seems well supported. Like every open source project with nightly builds some might be better than others, but overall I am happier using it with mpeg HD including h264 and ac3 then other choices.

Martin
Reddwarf
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 6,629
Threads: 230
Joined: Mar 2007
#8
2010-12-17, 06:03 AM
Well if it is well supported it is good, but nevertheless locking npvr to one set of decoders is throwing away an important piece of it's versatility.

"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#9
2010-12-17, 06:25 AM
Reddwarf Wrote:Well if it is well supported it is good, but nevertheless locking npvr to one set of decoders is throwing away an important piece of it's versatility.
I don't think anyone has suggested doing that.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
mvallevand
Offline

Posting Freak

Ontario Canada
Posts: 53,191
Threads: 958
Joined: May 2006
#10
2010-12-17, 06:24 PM
7ore, you wrote about using the API to control subtitles. Using NPVR the only subtitles I seem to be able to control using ffdshow are North American closed captions. I can create my own graphs using the Haali splitter that I can control, and even then if DirectVobSub is included, I don't have any luck.

Can you control them manually using the red ffdshow tray icon?

Martin
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Two GBPVR Hosts: Seeing and controlling each other dvasco 0 1,069 2006-09-16, 05:23 PM
Last Post: dvasco
  popup box to change ffdshow settings on the fly via remote reven 4 1,860 2005-09-21, 10:10 AM
Last Post: reven

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode