NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Hardware v
« Previous 1 … 13 14 15 16 17 … 263 Next »
DVB-T/T2 tuner for weak signals

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
DVB-T/T2 tuner for weak signals
NumberFive
Offline

Senior Member

UK/Ireland
Posts: 664
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2007
#1
2015-05-10, 04:21 PM
Hi,

Does anyone have a recommendation for a DVB-T/T2 tuner that is good at receiving weak multiplexes? When I am I can receive about 10 multiplexes on both a Panasonic TV (2012) and a Samsung TV (2014), all without a problem. Most of the multiplexes are strong (100 kW) and so are received with 10 signal strength, 10 quality, 0 Bit-error-rate. Two of the multiplexes are weak (3 kW), but are received with middle signal strength, max signal quality by both TVs (0 BER).

However, I have a Hauppauge Nova-T and an AstroMeta USB Stick, neither of which can receive the weaker multiplexes. They will on occasion pick up the channels on a scan, but can't lock a channel.

I've put a lot of effort into outdoor TV aerials, good Labgear distribution amplifiers, and good quality coax cables throughout the system, so I'm confident that what is getting to the back of the tuners is a good signal, just the TV sets seem to have better tuners than the PC does.

I appreciate that the Nova-T is really old at this stage and probably well surpassed by modern chipsets, and the AstroMeta is really cheap, so suggestions welcome! Smile
"It's better than a box!"
Graham
Offline

Posting Freak

UK
Posts: 4,058
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2005
#2
2015-05-10, 06:38 PM
A long time ago, the signal here was weak and the Nova-T was as good as anything else that I used. I still use a couple of ten year old Nova-Ts and I haven't seen anything to suggest that they get worse with time. My view is that if it can't be received with a Nova-T then it can't be received. But I haven't had reception problems since the transmitter power was boosted at about the time of digital switchover so I may not be the best source of information.
NumberFive
Offline

Senior Member

UK/Ireland
Posts: 664
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2007
#3
2015-05-10, 07:39 PM
Hi Graham,

I'm not suggesting that the Nova-T cards get worse with time, I'm suggesting that more modern chipsets have better performance than older ones. Smile

As evidenced by the fact that TVs from two different manufactures can receive my weak multiplexes with zero BER and the Nova-T cannot, despite my best efforts to avoid all obvious sources of interference, then the Nova-T must be behind the curve these days.

Interestingly the AstroMeta tuner seems to use good brand name ICs, but suffers from crummy RF design. Can't complain, was about £17 inc. P&P, but willing to spend more for good performance. Big Grin
"It's better than a box!"
bgowland
Offline

Posting Freak

West Yorkshire, UK
Posts: 4,583
Threads: 384
Joined: Dec 2004
#4
2015-05-11, 10:13 PM
Technically the tuning / locking of a signal doesn't have much to do with chipsets bearing in mind the UHF carrier is analogue. Yes, there will be analogue chips involved as well as discrete analogue components, *but* RF tuners and their theory have been around since radio transmitters / receivers were invented. The "best", most stable, most sensitive tuning circuitry was invented a long time ago - as to whether any manufacturer chooses to implement the "best" of course depends on limitations as a result of design / manufacturing costs.

I have four Nova-T (90002) cards and they've always behaved fine but then again I've always lived in a good reception area originally 20 miles away from Crystal Palace, now just a few miles from the Idle transmitter in W. Yorkshire (it's huge and on top of a blinking great hill). Interestingly, according to UKFree.TV Idle only broadcasts at 50W for each MUX.

Dumb-ass questions - do you have the correct aerial for the recommended band/group? Are you sure your distribution amps aren't adding to the problem, i.e., boosting the signal too much and causing increased noise-to-signal ratio?
NumberFive
Offline

Senior Member

UK/Ireland
Posts: 664
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2007
#5
2015-05-12, 09:15 AM
Hi bgowland, thanks for the reply but that's not quite right. The technology used in DVB-T/T2 (high order QAM) is something that continues to be refined in modern radio ICs. This isn't a technology that has been long term stable. It's not just me saying so, for example:

"Second Generation DVB-T2/T/C Demodulator IC with
Substantially Improved Functionality and Performance
and Designed for Ease of Use"

http://www.sony.net/Products/SC-HP/cx_ne...34ER_R.pdf

I don't have a problem with my TV signal, I designed the amplifier/distribution system myself. Two modern TV sets are able to lock the signals just fine and demodulate them with zero BER. The Nova-T demonstrates that it is less sensitive (be that due to an inferior radio IC, or poor RF design), in that it cannot reliably lock the weaker multiplexes, and when it can the BER is so high the channels are unwatchable. I've tried a cheap DVB-T2 stick, but I've read elsewhere that it suffers from poor PCB design allowing the other chips on the board to cause interference with the radio IC.

I'm really hoping to hear experience receiving fringe signals. I do intend to buy a few different tuners myself, test them and report back, but would be helpful to avoid dead ends.
"It's better than a box!"
martint123
Offline

Posting Freak

UK, East Yorkshire
Posts: 4,658
Threads: 208
Joined: Nov 2005
#6
2015-05-12, 09:53 AM
From reading on here over the years the conclusion I've come to is that domestic TVs are more sensitive than all computer tuners and no one can really say why.
It may not be by much but shows itself just at the boundary of signal/no signal. I've had mast head preamps, amplifying distribution boxes and new coax.
The only thing that got me a reliable signal from Belmont was to site the aerial on a 20 foot pole.
NumberFive
Offline

Senior Member

UK/Ireland
Posts: 664
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2007
#7
2015-05-12, 10:52 AM
I've read similar observations on the forums over the years. I suspect the PC stuff suffers from poor RF design. Might crack open one of the AstroMeta sticks and see if there are any tweaks I can make that make a difference. I'll report back later when I break the AstroMeta. Tongue
"It's better than a box!"
martint123
Offline

Posting Freak

UK, East Yorkshire
Posts: 4,658
Threads: 208
Joined: Nov 2005
#8
2015-05-13, 09:20 AM
I was up in the shack this morning where the headless server sits, coverless. One thing that leaped out was that the nova-t-500 is sat less than 1/2 an inch away from the video board with all it's highly strung and clocked devices. I haven't got access to a spectrum analyser any more, but there must be huge amounts of RF noise generated by the video card (and others).
The actual tuner on the nova-t, after removing the lid, seems to be as well constructed and laid out as a TV tuner.
NumberFive
Offline

Senior Member

UK/Ireland
Posts: 664
Threads: 153
Joined: Jun 2007
#9
2015-05-13, 10:13 AM
Hi Martin,

Indeed, back before analogue switch off I had to wrap the Nova-T-500 in foil to get some of the weaker multiplexes. I'm reluctant to go back to that though I might experiment if I get time (mainly reluctant because at least one of the weak multiplexes now is a DVB-T2 one). I'd have thought the USB tuners would stand more chance being out of the RF soup inside the PC chassis, but then I've read reports of the PCB in the AstroMeta I have been poorly designed, and it's in a plastic box anyway. Might try putting it all in a metal box first (in case the noise is external), then if that fails I'll see what happens if I put a piece of foil around the radio IC. I might be able to borrow a spectrum analyser, but I know if I do I'll spend huge amounts of time on this! Big Grin
"It's better than a box!"
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  HDHR Tuner quality Allan 3 484 2025-05-23, 10:53 AM
Last Post: Prsa01
  Two USB tuner sticks work? tvroosta 2 995 2024-05-07, 04:56 PM
Last Post: tvroosta
  Tuner Card tesla1886 4 1,336 2023-09-02, 12:30 AM
Last Post: tesla1886
  Tuner: sussing out the bad one of 4 legoschmego 7 1,446 2023-08-11, 03:22 AM
Last Post: legoschmego
  New tuner card out. buntay20 10 2,193 2023-06-09, 01:44 PM
Last Post: NumberFive
  Problems with new HDHR tuner MovieBuff 18 3,381 2023-04-12, 06:08 PM
Last Post: MovieBuff
  WIll oid identify a failing tuner? RoadRat 1 852 2023-03-17, 05:30 AM
Last Post: sub
  Usb dual HD Hauppauge tuner sound? eastavin 12 2,580 2023-03-01, 03:36 AM
Last Post: eastavin
  Tuner Advice pg33 3 1,613 2022-11-04, 01:36 AM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Replace Hauppauge tuner card with Hauppauge 1682 or HDHomeRun Flex Duo? mountainsoft 0 1,073 2022-10-29, 01:34 AM
Last Post: mountainsoft

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode