NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 129 130 131 132 133 … 1231 Next »
Where to go from here.

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Where to go from here.
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#11
2009-05-31, 07:54 PM
No offense was meant, but being a software developer myself, my first assessment was that it's possible to match it up programatically for the most part. I noticed there where more than a few channels with multiple options which would take some special handling and would add some complexity.

My cable broadcaster doesn't broadcast the call signs or anything like that. In SchedulesDirect you get a full list of all the channels along with the (call sign/names).

http://www.flickr.com/photos/38973285@N07/3582828566/

I'm figuring that you could probably do a regex match (or even just a split() on the delimiter) and use the digital channel as the key in a hash. Then match them to the EPG information downloaded from SchedulesDirect.

So digital channels 90.455, 90.450, 90.445 would turn into a keyed array like:

[455]->[90.455]
[450]->[90.450]
[445]->[90.445]

Then you could just match up the schedules direct listing by using the channel as the key to find the value. "455 KIVIDT" would be matched to 90.455 using 455 as the key. As I mentioned above, the multiple options for a digital channel would be a little more complicated but doable.

Again, no offense was meant, but while I was working on setting everything up last night, the wheels started turning. Smile
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,810
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#12
2009-05-31, 07:57 PM
Quote:So digital channels 90.455, 90.450, 90.445 would turn into a keyed array like:

[455]->[90.455]
[450]->[90.450]
[445]->[90.445]
I'm aware of this, but unfortunately there is only a couple of cable broadcasters in the US that broadcast this way, with the transport stream program number (the "455" of 90.455) matching the channel number on the cable boxes. The majority do not do this.

I specifically added the "90.455" part to the results GBPVR shows knowing that it would help at least some users simplify their mapping.
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#13
2009-05-31, 08:06 PM
Oh... that sucks. CableOne has generally been a disappointment for me, but I guess I'm happy to see they're doing one thing right. Smile

So another idea popped into my head last night as well. Another way this process could be a little less painful would be to allow a user to export their list EPG/Channel list as an XML file that would allow them to share it with other users. That way one poor sucker like myself would take the time to set it up, and then other users could import it into their install of GB-PVR and get up and running faster. Smile
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#14
2009-05-31, 08:41 PM
Given the vast number of cable providers in the US and the fairly limited number of GB-PVR users per provider, I doubt sub's effort on such a task would be worthwhile. Add to that the fact that the cable providers appear to change their lineups fairly often, and any such exported list would be obsolete quickly. I think every GB-PVR user will simply need to get familiar with the task of scanning and mapping channels.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#15
2009-05-31, 09:45 PM
Ok, well just trying to offer some suggestions to make the product a little better.
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#16
2009-06-01, 12:29 AM (This post was last modified: 2009-06-01, 12:33 AM by risingfish.)
If anyone is still reading this, I think I found the source of my confusion. When I try to map the channels using to the frequency, I do not get any channels under 79. Any idea what might cause this? I should mention I only have one Digital Tuner configured right now.
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#17
2009-06-01, 12:43 AM
Your cable provider doesn't have any digital channels below 79. Your digital channels are all on 5 frequencies: 79, 80, 89, 90 and 100; that means multi-record will work really well for you. If you want to tune analog channels, you'll need to setup the analog side of your 2250.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#18
2009-06-01, 01:47 AM
Thanks johnson. I think I don't fully understand how to set this card up. Do I need 2 digital sources and two analog sources? or one digital and one analog source?
johnsonx42
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,298
Threads: 189
Joined: Sep 2008
#19
2009-06-01, 01:59 AM
2 digital and 2 analog. The catch with this card is that there are only two tuners, each can operate in analog OR digital mode. So even though you'll have 4 tuners defined in config, only 2 can operate at any one time. GB-PVR knows this, sub added some logic a couple of releases back to handle this.

I believe you setup your first digital device as device 1, and the second as device 2. Then you do the same for the analog side.
server: NextPVR 5.0.7/Win10 2004/64-bit/AMD A6-7400k/hvr-2250 & hvr-1250/Winegard Flatwave antenna/Schedules Direct
main client: NextPVR 5.0.7 Desktop Client; LG 50UH5500 WebOS 3.0 TV
risingfish
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 14
Threads: 2
Joined: Jul 2007
#20
2009-06-01, 04:16 AM
It's finally all coming together. Channels are working... HD and analog, EPG is updating. I don't remember my pvr 500 being this tough. Smile

Now all I need to do is figure out why it's not finding the Cyberlink MUX.

Thanks for all the help!
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (3): « Previous 1 2 3 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode