2006-06-20, 08:44 PM
Ok....I know there are a couple of threads regarding this very same thing. But I'm torn. It seems like ATI is the smarter choice even with my ASUS mb with nvidia chip set. But I can never figure out ATI's model lineup.
I have a budget of $170 CDN. I've read a lot of threads saying the 9550 and up have hardware de-interlacing. And the 9550 is only $68 at my local shop. So does the x series of cards have it as well? Like the x700 which is $179. I assume only due to price that it is a higher end card and would do a stellar job in my htpc but will it? Or is the 9600 a better card?
Off to more reading but some feed back would be appreciated.
I have a budget of $170 CDN. I've read a lot of threads saying the 9550 and up have hardware de-interlacing. And the 9550 is only $68 at my local shop. So does the x series of cards have it as well? Like the x700 which is $179. I assume only due to price that it is a higher end card and would do a stellar job in my htpc but will it? Or is the 9600 a better card?
Off to more reading but some feed back would be appreciated.
[SIZE="1"]Main HTPC - ASUS M2NPV-VM Athlon 4200+ X2 1 GIG DDR2-667 500 GIG of HD space Hauppauge PVR-150 PCI Hauppauge DVB-S-Plus GBPVR 99.12 VFD/LCD (Still working on it)
Client HTPC - Athlon 2500+, 512 Mb RAM, 200Gig Dump, 250Gig Archive, 20 Gig OS Hauppagge WinTV PVR USB2 GBPVR 99.05
Client - SoftMod Xbox, XBMC[/SIZE]
Client HTPC - Athlon 2500+, 512 Mb RAM, 200Gig Dump, 250Gig Archive, 20 Gig OS Hauppagge WinTV PVR USB2 GBPVR 99.05
Client - SoftMod Xbox, XBMC[/SIZE]