NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public NextPVR Other Clients Old Stuff (legacy) MVP & NMT v
« Previous 1 … 38 39 40 41 42 … 115 Next »
timestamp fix needed for Nova-T500?

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
timestamp fix needed for Nova-T500?
StevHodge
Offline

Member

Posts: 179
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2006
#1
2007-07-24, 10:43 PM
I am having the random skip with MVP problem referred to elsewhere in this forum. My machine has a Hauppauge Nova T 500 dual (digital) tuner and I am wondering whether the PVR150 timestamp fix referred to is needed. I don't want to just do it since the fix included new drivers for the capture card which surely can't be the same between the PVR150 and the Nova-T 500. Can anyone enlighten me? Or is there some other reasons for the random skip behaviour? I am running 99.12. Will the new version help?
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,707
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#2
2007-07-24, 10:46 PM
Quote:My machine has a Hauppauge Nova T 500 dual (digital) tuner and I am wondering whether the PVR150 timestamp fix referred to is needed.
No. In the PVR150 the timestamp is generated by the hardware encoder. With the digital devices like Nova-T, the timestamps are generated by mux filter.

You could try a different mux or version of the mux to see if you find one that works better in this respect.
martint123
Offline

Posting Freak

UK, East Yorkshire
Posts: 4,658
Threads: 208
Joined: Nov 2005
#3
2007-07-25, 08:41 AM
I too have horrendous timestamp problems with a nova-t-500. It certainly won't be the pvr150 problem. But I don't know what it is. I have tried different multiplexors and no improvement (currently Cyberlink 5.0.1307). I'm getting a good strength indicated.

Symptoms include pressing "backward skip" take me forwards - up to 15 mintues forward!.

I think videoredo's quickstream fix fixed it, but this is no good for watching delayed TV that is still recording.

The technicalities of mpeg video are well beyond me, so I don't know how skipping works - but there must be different methods as things like VLC can move back and forth a file fairly accurately.
stustunz
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,111
Threads: 112
Joined: Oct 2006
#4
2007-07-25, 08:50 AM
i get the step backward thing with my dvb-s tuner avermedia real weird when your trying to watch something i put it down to bad signal though
zehd
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,119
Threads: 249
Joined: Feb 2006
#5
2007-07-25, 03:21 PM
It would seem that you're experiencing the same issue as many people have when they transcode an AVI on the fly to be viewed on the MVP.

In that case the transcoder, either ffmpeg, mencoder, or vlc, doesn't create the correct or good pts in the MPG (I think that's it). I think of it as Control Track or sprockets (that shows you how old I am...) that is damaged or spaced incorrectly...

It would seem that your muxers are working like 'transcoding' too.

It seems that the reason a 150 etc can record well and view properly on an MVP, is the hardware encoder is creating the correct pts in the MPG.

I don't have a solution. Just threw out a suggestion that we're in the same boat, and if so, it might not be fixed soon...
Frank Z
[COLOR="Gray"]
I used to ask 'why?' Now I just reinstall...
[SIZE="1"]______________________________________________
Author: ZTools: ZProcess, MVPServerChecker; UltraXMLTV Enhancer, Renamer, Manager; [/SIZE]
[/COLOR]
StevHodge
Offline

Member

Posts: 179
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2006
#6
2007-07-26, 11:31 PM
Think I have got it working reasonably OK, following subs suggestion to try different muxers. Config gives me several muxer options one of which is 'intervideo' and this seems to work quite well. Skips back and forward perfectly OK whether or not program is still recording. Sometimes the audio goes out of sync with the video, but usually with another skip it gets back in sync. Worst case is I have to stop and restart and then skip straight to where I was before.

I tried to find some data on this 'intervideo' (ie where it came from, its version, file name etc) but sub's mux checker doesn't show it, and I can't see it either in gspot or directshow filter manager. It must be there I suppose, but disguised in some way. Over the years I have installed a lot of stuff and I have no idea where this one came from. Can someone point me to where I can find the file name easily so I can post some more useful data
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,707
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#7
2007-07-27, 12:15 AM
Quote:I tried to find some data on this 'intervideo' (ie where it came from, its version, file name etc) but sub's mux checker doesn't show it
If muxchecker doesnt show, then GB-PVR isnt using it. It'll just be falling back to using one of the other muxes (probably the cyberlink one). You can check which mux is used by looking at the filter list in GBPVRRecordingService.exe-native.log.
hasso
Offline

Senior Member

Posts: 465
Threads: 81
Joined: Dec 2004
#8
2007-07-27, 05:25 AM
stustunz Wrote:i get the step backward thing with my dvb-s tuner avermedia real weird when your trying to watch something i put it down to bad signal though

Interesting. i gett he same problem with the avermedia as well. It seems the skipping backwards and forwards have a mind of their own...
Regards,
Hasso

[SIZE="2"]Server: NPVR 2.2.6, Asus E35M1-M PRO motherboard, 2 x 2GB DDR-1333 memory, 1 x 1.5TB SATA Samsung HD, 2 x 2TB SATA Seagate Green HD, 1 x Hauppauge HD4400, 2 x Hauppauge Nova T 500, Windows 7 Home.
Clients: EGreat M34A with MVPMCX2; HDX1000 with MVPMCX2 and internal 2TB SATA Seagate Green HD.[/SIZE]
StevHodge
Offline

Member

Posts: 179
Threads: 37
Joined: Apr 2006
#9
2007-07-27, 10:26 PM
Very odd. I looked at the logs for the filters, after I tried each one that appears in GBPVR config. Couldn't see any substantial difference (some PID numbers changed only) and the most of the non cyberlink ones said -'cant'find xxxxx....' going to cyberlink'

What is odd is that there seemed to be a performance improvement between the Intervideo and the Cyberlink, even though the log says clearly that gbpvr defaulted to the Cyberlink one. Maybe an optical illusion or some more sinister meeting
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,707
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#10
2007-07-27, 11:56 PM
StevHodge Wrote:What is odd is that there seemed to be a performance improvement between the Intervideo and the Cyberlink, even though the log says clearly that gbpvr defaulted to the Cyberlink one.
I'm sure its the placebo effect...
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Vista 64, MVP & GBPVR: guidance needed reedmikel 5 3,449 2009-05-12, 04:47 PM
Last Post: reedmikel
  WinTV Nova T USB2 + MVP szkoda 9 2,799 2008-01-27, 07:55 PM
Last Post: sub
  Audio Video Sync (Nova-S and MVP) fire 12 5,552 2007-11-28, 09:32 AM
Last Post: fire
  New MVP - network advice needed. fausto 4 1,915 2007-11-12, 05:54 PM
Last Post: fausto
  Is the timestamp glitch still an issue in 1.0.16? Subversive 2 1,442 2007-09-27, 10:03 AM
Last Post: sub
  bandwidth needed? nippywiffle 7 2,376 2007-03-27, 11:40 PM
Last Post: wtg
  Hauppauge - Win-TV NOVA-T - TV Card jonmvp 8 2,814 2007-03-14, 02:31 PM
Last Post: PMF
  Wireless Access Point Setup help needed sidneysides 9 3,032 2006-12-01, 08:29 PM
Last Post: melearp
  MVP & Nova-T USB2 svkhtn 1 1,390 2005-11-24, 04:01 PM
Last Post: smalldave
  server CPU resources needed for MVP? BobAtTorrey 1 1,605 2005-07-16, 09:35 AM
Last Post: Bigted

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode