NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Wishlist v
« Previous 1 … 37 38 39 40 41 … 193 Next »
Pre and Post Paddings Should Be Respected

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Pre and Post Paddings Should Be Respected
LewE
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 771
Threads: 115
Joined: Oct 2007
#1
2009-12-04, 03:40 PM
I didn't add this to the very active thread requesting User Interface wishlist items because I believe it has to do more with the internals of GBPVR.

I have three analog capture cards, each set to be able to deal with all of the available channels. I have two programs that occur back-to back, each set to be a recurring schedule, and each with a 2 minute post padding. What ends up happening is that they both get scheduled to be recorded by the same capture source and the 2 minute post padding of the first program is lost. There are no other programs scheduled to be recorded at this time so all three capture cards are available but only one is used.

This means that I lose part of the first program each day because of the time for GBPVR to stop one recording and start the next. With most shows this isn't an issue but the two programs I am talking about are The Daily Show and The Colbert Report. The Daily Show puts some of its content at the very end of each show and I end up missing some or all of it.

I know that one of zehd's utilities could take care of some of this problem but there is still some finite time when nothing is recorded because of GBPVR switching between recordings so this isn't a solution.

Why doesn't GBPVR make use of another capture card and maintain the post recording padding for each show when this is possible?
Graham
Offline

Posting Freak

UK
Posts: 4,058
Threads: 102
Joined: Dec 2005
#2
2009-12-04, 03:56 PM
Config.xml has ...

Code:
<PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>false</PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>
  <TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>true</TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>
LewE
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 771
Threads: 115
Joined: Oct 2007
#3
2009-12-04, 04:48 PM
Graham Wrote:Config.xml has ...

Code:
<PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>false</PreferAlternatingCaptureSources>
  <TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>true</TryToHonourPaddingIfPossible>
Thanks for pointing this out.

Those two parameters were set like in your message and I changed the first one to be TRUE.

I don't understand how the program interprets the two parameters if they are set as in your message. Shouldn't the TryToHonour parameter force use of alternate capture sources for this instance?
Jaggy
Offline

Posting Freak

Carterton, NZ
Posts: 3,633
Threads: 148
Joined: Mar 2006
#4
2009-12-04, 08:35 PM
I had this exact same problem after sub introduced multi-record & I have mentioned it in a couple of messages with no response, I don't know if it is still there with 1.4.7 as I have only just upgraded & not tested it. BTW I have my config set the same as in Graham's message.

The only way I could find to stop it doing this undesirable behavior was to un-tick Multi-Record in config, after that all has worked the way it should & the WAF has increased again.
sub
Online

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#5
2009-12-05, 01:40 AM
Its hard to describe the million rules that have an effect on whether you get padding, but as pointed out above, having multi-record enabled can cause the 'TryToHonourPadding' to be ignored.
LewE
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 771
Threads: 115
Joined: Oct 2007
#6
2009-12-05, 02:53 AM
sub Wrote:Its hard to describe the million rules that have an effect on whether you get padding, but as pointed out above, having multi-record enabled can cause the 'TryToHonourPadding' to be ignored.
Like Graham suggested, I went and unchecked that option in CONFIG. I couldn't find an explanation of what that opiton means in the documentation wiki though.

Can you give a brief explanation of what it is.

I also set PreferAlternateCaptureSources in config.xml to true.
sub
Online

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#7
2009-12-05, 04:41 AM
PreferAlternateCaptureSource set to true will prefer to allocate recordings to different capture sources when its part of a back-to-back recording. This is at scheduling time.

'TryToHonourPadding' is something effects the logic at recording time, specifically if it needs to stop a recording when it reaches the post-padding to start some other recording, it'll try to find another available capture source to perform the later recording.

Neither of these options operate when the multi-record is in use though - which is a feature that allows multiple digital channels to be recorded simultaneousely on a single tuner.
LewE
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 771
Threads: 115
Joined: Oct 2007
#8
2009-12-05, 04:28 PM
sub Wrote:PreferAlternateCaptureSource set to true will prefer to allocate recordings to different capture sources when its part of a back-to-back recording. This is at scheduling time.

'TryToHonourPadding' is something effects the logic at recording time, specifically if it needs to stop a recording when it reaches the post-padding to start some other recording, it'll try to find another available capture source to perform the later recording.

Neither of these options operate when the multi-record is in use though - which is a feature that allows multiple digital channels to be recorded simultaneousely on a single tuner.
Thanks for the clarification. Since I use only analog channels I definitely don't need multi-record and it appears that this is what was making me lose the padding.

I think it would be useful if you added that warning about multi-record (referring to the Misc2 tab) to the Capture Sources portion of the Configuration Tool write-up in the documentation wiki.
ElihuRozen
Offline

Senior Member

Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 514
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2006
#9
2009-12-15, 02:30 AM
If I record something on the same channel from 9:00-9:30 & 9:30-10:00 on my digital tuner, it records both shows from 9:28-9:32. When I watch the first show, it goes from 8:58 to 9:32. The second show has from 9:28 to 10:02. I just have the single digital tuner (for now), but multiple analog tuners.
smiffypr
Offline

Member

Dorset, England (Rowridge TX)
Posts: 238
Threads: 36
Joined: Feb 2009
#10
2010-10-18, 12:25 AM
Now on N-PVR (version 1.5.31), this problem still exists, but the configuration parameters don't seem to, so I can't experiment with them.
But if I could, I still wouldn't want to disable multi-record in order to try to honour padding.
What I think would work would be to have an option to force the honouring of padding. With this option set, the recording would be treated as beginning at the beginning of pre-padding and ending at the end of post-padding, and any conflicts would then show up at the time the recording is set. The user would then have the choice of cancelling a recording, or reducing the padding on that program in order to remove the conflict.
As a workaround, (which I think will work), where I have one recording starting at the same time as another ends, I can set the program following the first one to record and that will force the first tuner to stay on that channel.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  save pre, post padding settings for each channel koijh65 0 794 2023-01-10, 01:43 AM
Last Post: koijh65
  Need negative pre-padding and post-padding values for web client scheduling Egregius 1 1,239 2020-10-29, 12:00 AM
Last Post: sub
  Option to set Pre/Post -Padding in seconds scJohn 6 3,218 2016-11-09, 07:27 AM
Last Post: sub
  Negative Pre-Padding and Post-Padding Times for Scheduled Recordings ChaosMageX 0 1,421 2015-10-23, 10:00 PM
Last Post: ChaosMageX
  Post Processing Request: File conversion for archiving, close captioning capture stuck-in-second 4 3,269 2015-03-20, 03:29 AM
Last Post: digiblur
  Options for post processing fred250 1 2,057 2014-12-14, 11:29 PM
Last Post: SickBoy
  negative minutes in post padding; directv LAN channel changer TomServo 0 1,374 2012-09-05, 11:16 AM
Last Post: TomServo
  Ability to dump DVB/ATSC based EPG from database to an XML for post-processing jksmurf 6 3,315 2011-11-03, 12:11 PM
Last Post: jksmurf
  Post Padding Ignored for Two Adjacent Programs LewE 10 3,417 2009-04-17, 10:47 PM
Last Post: LewE
  Pre-show / Post-show padding for manual recording csc12345678 2 1,463 2007-07-07, 04:45 AM
Last Post: sub

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode