2012-07-07, 11:18 AM
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know, or have ideas, on whether it's better (wear-and-tear wise) to let the computer sleep/hibernate between recording/viewing sessions, versus keeping the computer on constantly?
I have a vague memory of reading/learning that the switching between (relative) cold and heat which happens when you turn a computer on will cause more wear and tear than keeping the computer on, if you do it often.
Let's say the computer wakes up 4-8 times per day for watching, doing recordings and update the epg. Is there any significant difference in "lifespan" of the computer with either of the two options?
What do you think?
I have a vague memory of reading/learning that the switching between (relative) cold and heat which happens when you turn a computer on will cause more wear and tear than keeping the computer on, if you do it often.
Let's say the computer wakes up 4-8 times per day for watching, doing recordings and update the epg. Is there any significant difference in "lifespan" of the computer with either of the two options?
What do you think?