2005-12-20, 07:06 PM
Quote:If they're not imbedding the CC in the MPEG2 file then the question is...why wouldn't they? Don't they still do that with the PVR250?because this is now considered the "old way of doing things" which no longer meets their needs. See comment on MCE below.
Quote:Please don't read this as me bashing GB-PVR in any way.Dont worry, I'm not taking it that way. Its difficult for many people to understand what is happening with CC, and why they're not seeing it in their favourite applications, so I wanted to get a bit of knowledge out there.
Quote:Is every piece of video related software going to have to do it or can't Hauppauge just do something a little more standard?They reason they made this change, or rather Conexant who manufacture the chipsets and reference driver on which the Hauppauge drivers are based, is because a couple of years back (but after PVR250/350 existed) Microsoft specified that the VBI should be passed as a separate stream for compliance for their upcoming MCE platform. This carries a lot of weight, so this is now what industry is doing.