2009-07-05, 05:10 PM
I know video libraries and recording are hip, but I use the picture library functionality of gbpvr a lot, and I find it very poor.
I wanted to ask if it is continues being developed? are there improvements planned?
My picture library is large - since 2006. The list of folders is long. I know I can arrange it differently, but that's a big hassle, I'd prefer the picture library to be able to index it in various ways other than directories/file names.
Also, displaying a folder full of pictures is extremely slow. Compared to explorer, or any other picture browser, it does not make sense. All these tools prepare thumbnails, why is gbpvr doing it the slowest of them all?
Many questions, I hope to have a meaningful thread.
Thanks,
Dan
I wanted to ask if it is continues being developed? are there improvements planned?
My picture library is large - since 2006. The list of folders is long. I know I can arrange it differently, but that's a big hassle, I'd prefer the picture library to be able to index it in various ways other than directories/file names.
Also, displaying a folder full of pictures is extremely slow. Compared to explorer, or any other picture browser, it does not make sense. All these tools prepare thumbnails, why is gbpvr doing it the slowest of them all?
Many questions, I hope to have a meaningful thread.
Thanks,
Dan