NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 535 536 537 538 539 1231 Next »
Hauppauge HVR1600

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Hauppauge HVR1600
zaphod7501
Offline

Member

Posts: 196
Threads: 1
Joined: Dec 2006
#81
2007-04-06, 01:14 AM
I spend quite a bit of time over at VideoReDo and there are a number of things that can happen and a number of tools to examine files. One occurrence is a station that literally changes resolution in the middle of a program (sometimes for commercials) Instead of putting the standard res material within the 16x9 frame they switch the stream which makes processing impossible until you seperate the two resolutions or cut off the offending portion (if it is at the very beginning of the file).
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#82
2007-04-06, 03:28 AM
Cahill84 Wrote:I just remembered that we have a secure server on campus that I can put it on then send you an invite to it. What e-mail address would you prefer that sent to?
I got your file. When I go to the video library, I was able to transcode from 'TS to MPEG2'. The 175MB file quickly transcoded completely to a 164MB .mpg file. I had some problems playing the file though, so I made one small change to config.xml to force it to produce an MPEG2 contain file (instead of MPEG1, which it strangely seemed to use). This change was:

Quote:
<
AutoConvertTSCommand>-y -i "{SOURCE_FILE}" -vcodec copy -acodec copy -f dvd "{DEST_FILE}"</AutoConvertTSCommand>
(see the additional "-f dvd")

With this it converted fine, to a 167MB file, which played fine for me, though there were a couple of brief stutters in the file. When I looked closer at these I saw there was a couple of "farts and pops" in your original source at these same times, which I can only guess a reception problems you might be having? These could be contributing to your difficulties transcoding.

For future reference, please dont use sample test files from episodes of shows I'm watching but havnt seen yet... Big Grin
whurlston
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,885
Threads: 102
Joined: Nov 2006
#83
2007-04-06, 04:13 AM
sub Wrote:For future reference, please dont use sample test files from episodes of shows I'm watching but havnt seen yet... Big Grin

There is no emoticon for the amount of laughter I got from this.Big Grin
Cahill84
Offline

Member

Posts: 158
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2007
#84
2007-04-06, 05:42 AM (This post was last modified: 2007-04-06, 05:50 AM by Cahill84.)
Sorry Sub, I didn't even think about that.

1) So you think the stuttering is my reception not necessarily related to Ts mux?
2) Could something like this have affected my DVR-M$ conversions?
ASUS A8V Deluxe MB | AMD Athlon 64 3200+
1 Gb Ram | 320 GB & 500 GB SATA II HDs
Sapphire X 1650 Pro | Hauppauge HVR-1600
Windows XP Pro running pvr-x2 1.1.5
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#85
2007-04-06, 06:00 AM
Quote:1) So you think the stuttering is my reception not necessarily related to Ts mux?
Do you get these 'farts and pops' much? I could definitely see a few of them in the recording. If they're caused by reception problems, it could certainly be contributing to your problems.

Quote:2) Could something like this have affected my DVR-M$ conversions?
It may be part of it, but most ATSC users have problems converting DVR-MS files.
Cahill84
Offline

Member

Posts: 158
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2007
#86
2007-04-06, 06:07 AM
Yes, I get that throughout the entire show. What I find weird is I have 88% strength and 85-90% quality for that channel. I'm surpised to see that happen.
ASUS A8V Deluxe MB | AMD Athlon 64 3200+
1 Gb Ram | 320 GB & 500 GB SATA II HDs
Sapphire X 1650 Pro | Hauppauge HVR-1600
Windows XP Pro running pvr-x2 1.1.5
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#87
2007-04-06, 06:19 AM
I dont have much experience with ATSC (having never seen it in action myself), so cant really comment too much, but I sometimes wonder what does "85-90% quality" mean? Its obviously not perfect, and implies some packet loss. I'm sure a lot of it is recoverable (solomon-reed encoding etc), but how much flows through to missing/broken packets received downstream..

With ATSC, the vast majority of the data in the stream usually relates to the one high definition channel, so lost packets are most likely to be in the video data for the channel you're watching/recording. With DVB the stream usually carries about 9 channels standard definition channel, so lost packets are a lot less likely to affect the channel you're recording. I dont really know though, just musing.

Do you get flawless recordings with DVR-MS? ie no pops?
Cahill84
Offline

Member

Posts: 158
Threads: 9
Joined: Feb 2007
#88
2007-04-06, 06:26 AM
Signifigantly less. Not 100% perfect, but maybe a stutter every 2-4 minutes, sometimes longer. I have one recording that went like 25 minutes without it. It does better, but it's not perfect either.
ASUS A8V Deluxe MB | AMD Athlon 64 3200+
1 Gb Ram | 320 GB & 500 GB SATA II HDs
Sapphire X 1650 Pro | Hauppauge HVR-1600
Windows XP Pro running pvr-x2 1.1.5
whurlston
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 7,885
Threads: 102
Joined: Nov 2006
#89
2007-04-06, 06:27 AM
Thanks to Nick at Silicondust:

Quote:Status numbers for a channel:

"ss" is the signal strength expressed as a percentage. It is a measurement of the analog signal.

"snq" is the signal-to-noise quality - the signal-to-noise ratio expressed as a percentage (higher is better).

"seq" is the symbol error quality - it should read 100% indicating no digital errors.

Of course the abbreviations are for HDHomeRun users but the measurements are for all digital (ATSC/QAM) broadcasts.

Edit: Cahill84, your "Quality" is probably the snq. 85-90 is pretty good.
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,807
Threads: 769
Joined: Nov 2003
#90
2007-04-06, 06:28 AM
Cahill84 Wrote:Signifigantly less. Not 100% perfect, but maybe a stutter every 2-4 minutes, sometimes longer. I have one recording that went like 25 minutes without it. It does better, but it's not perfect either.
Might be worth finding out if this is similar to what others see, or whether they fare better.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (12): « Previous 1 … 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next »
Jump to page 


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  GBPVR support for Hauppauge WinTV-HVR-1900 or Hauppauge HD-PVR (PAL) lchiu7 23 18,724 2014-05-15, 12:59 AM
Last Post: lchiu7
  Hauppauge 2250 MCE remote Jeckler 22 20,967 2013-03-26, 04:26 PM
Last Post: DonBrutto
  Composite Source using Hauppauge PVR500 gives sound but no video DukeBrymin 1 3,103 2012-02-03, 02:41 AM
Last Post: slowtech
  Will A Hauppauge Colossus work in 1.4.7? hondophred 5 3,827 2011-06-29, 09:12 PM
Last Post: sub
  Recording problem with Hauppauge Nova-S USB2 ... softfoot 4 3,461 2011-06-27, 02:06 AM
Last Post: sub
  Hauppauge 1600 analog stopped working stoenjes 2 2,022 2010-11-16, 11:09 PM
Last Post: ryanmc
  HVR1600 recording issue David B 8 3,114 2010-11-05, 01:36 AM
Last Post: pBS
  Can I record two channels with a Hauppauge HVR-3000 DVB-T (FreeView UK)? philcooling 1 1,792 2010-11-02, 06:15 PM
Last Post: sub
  Internal Hauppauge WinTV MOD7700 ATSC -- what BDA do I use? h103 7 5,402 2010-10-08, 08:29 PM
Last Post: juanrod160
  Comcast DCI105COM1 DTA and Hauppauge IR Blaster not working DonP 6 7,370 2010-09-26, 03:46 AM
Last Post: pBS

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode