npvr and winxp?
|
2011-02-24, 11:31 AM
Reddwarf Wrote:That is almost an exact description of what I used when I was running XP, Cyberlink PDVD9/10, ATI 3450 graphic card, and interlaced MPEG2 video recorded. I always used DXVA with EVR. Cpu load was typically 15-18%, worked like a dream for almost two years. Two years? We're talking about nPVR here, not GBPVR, which didn't have these problems.
2011-02-24, 11:33 AM
Reddwarf Wrote:And yes, it worked with all the VMR9 variants too, but that typically used 50-60% cpu. Beleive me, I'v tested this very thoroughly back in those days. 50-60% on MPEG-2? Then you did something wrong...
[SIZE="1"]My projects:
SAF6 (Standalone Filters) HOBRing - My easy Amiga emulation My HTPC[/SIZE]
2011-02-24, 11:35 AM
Quote:Two years? We're talking about nPVR here, not GBPVR, which didn't have these problems. Yep, it worked both with gbpvr and later npvr. Quote:50-60% on MPEG-2? Then you did something wrong... Well try for yourself without dxva and a slow cpu.... "I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
2011-02-24, 11:54 AM
Reddwarf Wrote:Well try for yourself without dxva and a slow cpu.... Tested on Atom 330 - this stupid integrated intel GPU doesnot support NV12, so YUY2 is in use - CPU usage 6-13%. Under GB-PVR FSE is a little more. Source video is SD PAL MPEG-2 - interlaced. ![[Image: cpu_usage.png]](http://hobring.esero.net/saf/gb-pvr/cpu_usage.png)
[SIZE="1"]My projects:
SAF6 (Standalone Filters) HOBRing - My easy Amiga emulation My HTPC[/SIZE]
2011-02-24, 01:04 PM
So what? This quarreling leads nowhere, what I'm saying is a fact.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
2011-02-24, 01:08 PM
Reddwarf Wrote:So what? This quarreling leads nowhere, what I'm saying is a fact. ? You wrote that playing MPEG-2 eat 50-60% of CPU usage when using VMR9. I post screenshot as an proof it is not true. Reddwarf Wrote:Well try for yourself without dxva and a slow cpu.... Atom is slow, FFDShow doesn't support DxVA for MPEG-2 and CPU usage is 6-13% while MPEG-2 PAL playback.
[SIZE="1"]My projects:
SAF6 (Standalone Filters) HOBRing - My easy Amiga emulation My HTPC[/SIZE]
2011-02-24, 04:49 PM
hoborg Wrote:? You wrote that playing MPEG-2 eat 50-60% of CPU usage when using VMR9. I post screenshot as an proof it is not true. I would not call an Atom 330 very slow  . It is obvious to me that you don't want to beleive what I'm saying, and there's nothing I can do about that. But you might as well have the last word, it seems to be important. I coulfn't care less.
"I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy"
2011-02-24, 11:09 PM
How do you only get 2 processes running on a windows box?
obiwan
-------------------------------------------------
My Toy.....P4 2.4G 1.0G Ram G6200 Purevideo HVR1600 MVP Popcorn Hour
2011-02-25, 06:49 AM
obiwan Wrote:How do you only get 2 processes running on a windows box? Removed using graphic editor...
[SIZE="1"]My projects:
SAF6 (Standalone Filters) HOBRing - My easy Amiga emulation My HTPC[/SIZE] |
|
|
