2007-11-18, 06:58 AM
bgowland Wrote:zehd - I've just looked again at the examples from your xmltv file in the first post. Which grabber are you using? It's badly broken as far as I can tell.
The xml may well be valid but some of it doesn't make sense from an xmltv point of view. It's one of those situations - all xmltv is xml but not all xml is xmltv.
Cheers,
Brian
I'm looking at making a validator. Part of a project I'm doing with -oz-. Of course that means digging into and understanding what a valid xmltv xml file should be...
Just on what you see, what's most obvious? I'm using D1XMLTVGrabber.exe which is a free grabber for Australia.
(I'm also working with another couple of grabbers, but this one seems to be getting better data)
Frank Z
[COLOR="Gray"]
I used to ask 'why?' Now I just reinstall...
[SIZE="1"]______________________________________________
Author: ZTools: ZProcess, MVPServerChecker; UltraXMLTV Enhancer, Renamer, Manager; [/SIZE]
[/COLOR]
[COLOR="Gray"]
I used to ask 'why?' Now I just reinstall...
[SIZE="1"]______________________________________________
Author: ZTools: ZProcess, MVPServerChecker; UltraXMLTV Enhancer, Renamer, Manager; [/SIZE]
[/COLOR]