NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 250 251 252 253 254 … 1231 Next »
No ATI Hardware Accel, MPC decoder shows no video

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
No ATI Hardware Accel, MPC decoder shows no video
escottster
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
#1
2008-09-29, 11:01 PM
Hey all,

I got a used PVR150 on ebay, and installed GBPVR a couple days ago. I've just been tweaking ever since.

I have never been able to get ATI Hardware Acceleration to work though. Here are my specs:

Athlon XP 2500+
ATI Radeon 9600xt
GBPVR 1.2.13
PVR150 (using s-video input)

I upgraded to the Catalyst 8.530 drivers, which solved a couple other issues, but not this one. I have "video mode" checked as well as the Windows Media PLayer Support, which is supposed to activate DXVA.

I downloaded the MPC decoder files listed on other threads in the forum, registered them with regsvr32, and changed the config.xml file.

When I use the MPC decoder, Live TV returns to the menu after a few seconds of black screen, or else remains black. I can't watch any recordings or other videos either, both give similar results.

I've tried the Cyberlink decoder also, and I get a fairly good picture (as long as I use VMR9 and not VMR9FSE) but my system runs at 100% CPU load. The Hardware Accel box IS checked in the Cyberlink options.

If I'm forgetting something, please let me know! Big Grin
escottster
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
#2
2008-09-29, 11:02 PM
Oh, and here are my logs. Thanks again
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,708
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#3
2008-09-29, 11:06 PM
escottster Wrote:I've tried the Cyberlink decoder also, and I get a fairly good picture (as long as I use VMR9 and not VMR9FSE) but my system runs at 100% CPU load. The Hardware Accel box IS checked in the Cyberlink options.
On thing to be aware of is that the Cyberlink settings store its settings on a per app basis, so settings seen in Config.exe may not be the same as it uses in PVRX2.exe. To make sure its enabled you'd need to either do a forum search for info about the registry settings to manually setup hardware acceleration in PVRX2.exe with the Cyberlink decoder, or search the registry for the Cyberlink Config.exe settings and rename them for the PVRX2.exe executable instead.
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,708
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#4
2008-09-29, 11:57 PM
The 2400 and up support H.264 hardware acceleration. They've had MPEG2 hardware acceleration for quite a while, and I'm fairly sure the 9600 supports this.
richardw456
Offline

Member

Posts: 142
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2007
#5
2008-09-30, 12:00 AM
sub Wrote:The 2400 and up support H.264 hardware acceleration. They've had MPEG2 hardware acceleration for quite a while, and I'm fairly sure the 9600 supports this.
Just deleted the message while you were posting. Wish I had realized that before I bought the 2400. I had a 9600 that I dumped to get hardware acc for MPEG2 (which is really all I use). Rats, something else I bought without the proper research! Like the $3000 HDTV that droped to $1500 the next year!! Grrr
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,708
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#6
2008-09-30, 12:07 AM
richardw456 Wrote:Just deleted the message while you were posting. Wish I had realized that before I bought the 2400. I had a 9600 that I dumped to get hardware acc for MPEG2 (which is really all I use). Rats, something else I bought without the proper research! Like the $3000 HDTV that droped to $1500 the next year!! Grrr
I'm fairly sure the 9600 only had support for SD MPEG2 acceleration, which is fine for the original poster's PVR150 captures. If you've got HD capture hardware, you'd probably have needed something more than a 9600.
escottster
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
#7
2008-09-30, 12:22 AM
Okay, I applied the registry patch found in this thread:

http://forums.nextpvr.com/showthread.php...+cyberlink

But I'm still getting a constant 100% cpu load while running gbpvr. In config.exe I have H.264 set to system default, as that's the only option it gives me.

I found out that currently MPC doesn't support my card, which is probably why that wasn't working.

Is there anything else I should try?
richardw456
Offline

Member

Posts: 142
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2007
#8
2008-09-30, 12:24 AM
sub Wrote:I'm fairly sure the 9600 only had support for SD MPEG2 acceleration, which is fine for the original poster's PVR150 captures. If you've got HD capture hardware, you'd probably have needed something more than a 9600.
Nope, DVD's and PVRX2 from the svideo in on my capture card. Of course, since I got my 2400 I just HAD to start playing with x264 encoded videos. Oh well. Another thought, though. The original HTPC was a Athlon XP 2000 with the 9600 and ffdshow. That worked fine for CPU usage till I started post processing in ffdshow. Decoding of DVD's was about 30 or 40 % as I remember. A 2500 should handle it. Could memory effect things?
sub
Offline

Administrator

NextPVR HQ, New Zealand
Posts: 106,708
Threads: 767
Joined: Nov 2003
#9
2008-09-30, 12:28 AM
escottster Wrote:Okay, I applied the registry patch found in this thread:

http://forums.nextpvr.com/showthread.php...+cyberlink

But I'm still getting a constant 100% cpu load while running gbpvr. In config.exe I have H.264 set to system default, as that's the only option it gives me.

I found out that currently MPC doesn't support my card, which is probably why that wasn't working.

Is there anything else I should try?
Maybe try the Overlay renderer.

Even without hardware acceleration I'm surprised you CPU usage is that high for playback of standard def files. I'd expect more like 30-40%.
escottster
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 18
Threads: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
#10
2008-09-30, 12:33 AM
I'm using VNC to control my media PC, which may account for some of the cpu load, but not a whole lot I wouldn't think.

One thing that I found odd is that when I change something in config.exe, after pressing okay it takes about 90 seconds to save my changes... I sort of thought it was a quirk of the program, but could something be wrong that's making the cpu load so high?

Thanks for your suggestions, sub!
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Composite Source using Hauppauge PVR500 gives sound but no video DukeBrymin 1 3,029 2012-02-03, 02:41 AM
Last Post: slowtech
  Two Channels Without Video skycyclepilot 5 3,474 2011-10-29, 07:49 PM
Last Post: sub
  Zehd's Video Library Slick Skin Snooze 0 2,222 2011-09-03, 01:09 AM
Last Post: Snooze
  GB-PVR + LAVF Audio decoder (DVD) hoborg 0 1,858 2011-04-06, 04:15 PM
Last Post: hoborg
  New Machine (probably old problems), Video Render Options jvcleave 12 5,314 2011-02-01, 08:37 AM
Last Post: stustunz
  No Video in PVRX2 GUI TonySmith35 13 4,867 2011-01-09, 10:31 PM
Last Post: steevo
  RECORDING STATUS WINDOW shows incorect info zb1 5 2,432 2010-12-11, 09:52 AM
Last Post: martint123
  Attempts to play .dvd files in Video Library results in PVRX2 not responding Jwbrit 2 2,018 2010-11-04, 11:37 PM
Last Post: Jwbrit
  Resolution Issues when re-encoding captured video bgrieb 5 2,889 2010-11-02, 03:52 AM
Last Post: mvallevand
  Skip forward during playback freezes video then audio smiffypr 3 2,827 2010-10-19, 12:46 AM
Last Post: smiffypr

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode