NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Hardware v
« Previous 1 … 129 130 131 132 133 … 263 Next »
Camera pans in playback are jerky/stuttery

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
Camera pans in playback are jerky/stuttery
stustunz
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,111
Threads: 112
Joined: Oct 2006
#11
2007-08-22, 01:39 AM
is your tv 4:3 or wide screen
800x600 always gave crap results
Remco
Offline

Member

Posts: 152
Threads: 12
Joined: Sep 2004
#12
2007-08-22, 07:41 AM
daskrabs Wrote:...
can anyone recommend a decoder comparable to purevideo that i might try, or is that as good as it gets, and i should try a better video card?

You might wanna give DScaler a try
erik
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,138
Threads: 123
Joined: Apr 2005
#13
2007-08-22, 08:57 AM
I use ffdshow
Video out is set to exact pixel size and frame rate of the TV, the video is send trough a interlaced RGB output.
In ffdshow I use the ffmpeg deinterlacer.
And I use vmr9

I tried to not use deinterlacing and to tell the renderer to use field synced output but I could not get it to work.

Still, motion quality is still worse compared to a HW mpeg decoder that outputs a interlaced video to the deinterlacer inside the TV. (my TV has a mpeg decoder inside that can play mpeg files from a UPnP network, but that can not skip commercials......)
P4 3GHz 1GB, 250GB, nVidia dualTV, GBPVR 1.3.11, XP
Support Comskip, visit the forum and donate at http://www.comskip.org/
daskrabs
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 40
Threads: 13
Joined: Feb 2007
#14
2007-08-22, 12:24 PM
Ted the Penguin Wrote:purevideo is one of the best decoders out there, IMHO.

a beefier video card would probably help, but your need to try different things depends on how good your performance is with your current stuff (is it just ok, or does it look pretty good?)


i looks good, especially animated stuff. the pans are the only lacking part.


stustunz Wrote:is your tv 4:3 or wide screen
800x600 always gave crap results

4:3 CRT. i doubt the windows resolution is making much difference, since the gbpvr stuff all looks the same.



Remco Wrote:You might wanna give DScaler a try
erik Wrote:I use ffdshow......

I'll try those 2 and report back. thanks
Ted the Penguin
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,590
Threads: 64
Joined: Aug 2006
#15
2007-08-22, 01:05 PM
daskrabs Wrote:4:3 CRT. i doubt the windows resolution is making much difference, since the gbpvr stuff all looks the same.

it does... it really does. gbpvr looks the same because it scales to the resolution of the screen. but you are likely to get better video quality be setting the resolution of the screen to the exact res of the TV.
sub Wrote:Are you trying to make sure I get nothing done today?
stustunz
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,111
Threads: 112
Joined: Oct 2006
#16
2007-08-22, 08:46 PM (This post was last modified: 2007-08-22, 08:56 PM by stustunz.)
yeah think of what is actualling hapening to the picture rather than just stabbing in the dark
the picture needs to match what the tv thinks it would normally get from a vdieo player other wise it just gets screwed they are old technolgy their fore when they were made they never receiveed the signal you are trying to put in

you need to match the frequency
match the resolution
make sure the signal is interlaced

it wont change a still picture but a moving picture has sync issues etc
each frame has to be shown at exactly the right time with the following one filling the rest of the picture in line by line odd/even(what interlaced does)
if that is out then the picture will show jerky or with lines or both
ie the lines are not been shown evenly because the frequency is out so the frame rate doesnt match and plus with resolution been wrong just compunds the problem

im not saying 720x576 or whatever is going to be the resolution for you but try other one than the 800x600 cause i can garentee that is not the right one

i still dont know if your using pal or ntsc so i cant give you anymore info


i have the same videocard (6200)ive just changed from purevideo decoder
which was perfect on vmr
to the cyberlink decoder version 6 seems to be better with the vmr custom
daskrabs
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 40
Threads: 13
Joined: Feb 2007
#17
2007-08-23, 12:12 AM
stustunz Wrote:yeah think of what is actualling hapening to the picture rather than just stabbing in the dark
the picture needs to match what the tv thinks it would normally get from a vdieo player other wise it just gets screwed they are old technolgy their fore when they were made they never receiveed the signal you are trying to put in

you need to match the frequency
match the resolution
make sure the signal is interlaced

it wont change a still picture but a moving picture has sync issues etc
each frame has to be shown at exactly the right time with the following one filling the rest of the picture in line by line odd/even(what interlaced does)
if that is out then the picture will show jerky or with lines or both
ie the lines are not been shown evenly because the frequency is out so the frame rate doesnt match and plus with resolution been wrong just compunds the problem

im not saying 720x576 or whatever is going to be the resolution for you but try other one than the 800x600 cause i can garentee that is not the right one

i still dont know if your using pal or ntsc so i cant give you anymore info


i have the same videocard (6200)ive just changed from purevideo decoder
which was perfect on vmr
to the cyberlink decoder version 6 seems to be better with the vmr custom


i believe and understand everything you wrote. being NTSC, i tried both 640x480 and 720x480. neither made a noticable difference in the camera pan jerks. i don't want to sound flippant, because i really appreciate all the help, but i can't see how scaling/rendering 800x600, being that low (relatively) of a resolution would make that much of a difference with mpg2s. the card was probably designed scale well at a much higher resolution, i.e. pc monitors. again, thanks for the help. i will try the cyberlink one.
stustunz
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,111
Threads: 112
Joined: Oct 2006
#18
2007-08-23, 01:59 AM (This post was last modified: 2007-08-23, 02:40 AM by stustunz.)
pc monitor are able to handle high resolutions they are designed to do so
tvs are not
4:3 tv is old (guessing here)they are designed for video signals otherwise every would have been using tvs as computer monitors years ago
just have a look at the writing on the screen ,text etc, bits will be missing the tv cant display it

the jerky picture will not be fixed if only one parameter is right
you have to get them all working at the right rate frequecies(their is more than just one but the others are pretty much fixed unless you really know what you are doing and 99% of us dont) pixel matching
its a bit more complex than just saying hey i tried changing that one setting and it made no difference so switched back



go do some searching google about interlacing and deinterlacing
what the different signals are Ntsc/pal
how they all work
im not trying to be rude but you really arnt getting the reasons why
i could sit here and try to explain it (all be it badly )
you would be better doing some reading
it helped me understand why you get jerky pan shots and gave me a better understanding what causes them and how the different signals work and why
Ted the Penguin
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 1,590
Threads: 64
Joined: Aug 2006
#19
2007-08-23, 02:39 AM
I agree, the best thing to do is educate yourself Smile
you will be happy afterwards, when you can talk circles around your friends about how TV works :p
sub Wrote:Are you trying to make sure I get nothing done today?
stustunz
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 5,111
Threads: 112
Joined: Oct 2006
#20
2007-08-23, 02:43 AM
or salesmen trying to sell you tvs that are just crap
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  How can i record an IP camera in NPVR (like a Vivotek or AXIS CCTV camera) SFX Group 1 2,282 2014-05-03, 09:01 PM
Last Post: martint123
  Playback HD? mattyb 11 4,616 2011-05-03, 12:08 PM
Last Post: jcjefferies
  ATI 5450 XP to Win 7 Horror story leads to XP codec H.264 HDPVR playback discovery tvshowman 4 4,120 2010-03-25, 02:38 PM
Last Post: Satori
  Is h.254 playback in pvrx2 on P4 and WinXP possible? tmrt 6 2,624 2010-02-06, 01:42 PM
Last Post: tmrt
  What CPU for video playback is best imagn 7 3,907 2010-02-02, 03:14 PM
Last Post: imagn
  PCI Graphics Cards - Can They Handle HD Playback? hasso 5 3,501 2010-01-26, 09:09 AM
Last Post: hasso
  Acer Revo Playback trummel 19 5,806 2009-12-03, 08:00 PM
Last Post: trummel
  Video Card Recommendation For US HD DXVA Playback In WinXP TonyXL 3 1,978 2009-09-13, 01:00 AM
Last Post: pBS
  Xvid/DivX playback picture quality 5058 6 3,303 2009-04-11, 08:35 AM
Last Post: gEd
  Hard Drive Speed and HD playback skhills 1 1,493 2009-04-01, 05:25 PM
Last Post: pBS

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode