NextPVR Forums
  • ______
  • Home
  • New Posts
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • Home
  • Wiki
  • Members
  • Help
  • Search
NextPVR Forums Public Add-ons (3rd party plugins, utilities and skins) Old Stuff (Legacy) GB-PVR Support (legacy) v
« Previous 1 … 664 665 666 667 668 … 1231 Next »
can anyone help explain this data?

 
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
can anyone help explain this data?
glitch
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 24
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
#1
2006-11-28, 02:09 AM (This post was last modified: 2006-11-28, 02:12 AM by glitch.)
I'm recording 1 hour long shows and editing commercials to bring actual mpeg file time down to about 42 minutes. With my previous software (ATI software) a 1 hour show would be about 2.9 gigs in size. That was using 8000kbps (CBR if I remember correctly; CBR is what I use in gbpvr), DVD quality (29.97, 720x480), 96kbps 2 channel 48khz audio. After editing the file down to 42 minutes the size would drop just about 1 gigabyte.

For some reason using the same settings with gbpvr I don't get the same file settings. Unfortunately the file sizes are larger and therefore I may have issues with getting 2 edited mpeg files onto a single DVD like I could using ATI software. The files created using ATI are actually 1 hr 5 min due to padding that I added and yet they are still 600 megs smaller. The file size with gbpvr is about 3.7 gigs for a 1 hour unedited show and 2.5 gigs for a 42 min version of it. Two 2.5 gig files won't fit onto a single layer DVD. I've tried to modify audio settings and change to VBR for video and I still can't get the edited file size down below 2.5 gigs or so. Why would the gbpvr software create a bigger file (by 600 megs) while using the same settings as ATI? (Granted, for recording with gbpvr I have to use 192kbps for audio bitrate but then I reencode using 96kbps to match the other files I already have but 192 vs 96 shouldn't mean a 600 meg difference) Could the keyframes be spaced differently with gbpvr?
HtV
Offline

Posting Freak

Posts: 3,470
Threads: 46
Joined: Dec 2005
#2
2006-11-28, 04:07 PM
glitch Wrote:After editing the file down to 42 minutes the size would drop just about 1 gigabyte.

During editing you must have decreased the bitrate, noway a 42 mins show can be 1 gig with a 8000 kbps bitrate. if you still have one of those shows it would be nice to run them through Gspot ( http://gspot.headbands.com/ ), to see what actual bitrate and resolution they are.
AMD Athlon 64 3000, HDD: 80, 120, 200 GB, Hauppauge 350 + 150, MVP, Asus 6000L Laptop client, Asus X50sl client,
Fritz!box 7140 modem/router, GBPVR 1.3.7.
melearp
Offline

Member

Posts: 93
Threads: 11
Joined: Oct 2005
#3
2006-11-28, 04:58 PM
I used to get similar symptoms as follows:

Record show with GBPVR - get, say, 3GB of recording
Pass recoding through VideoRedo with NO changes - recording down to 2GB

It turned out that I had on old MPEGMUX which obviously didn't do a good job of passing the data from the DVBT card down the chain to its eventual destination on disk. If you have an analogue card it's going to depend on just which piece of software is doing the encoding (or perhaps it's hardware encoding??). The quality of encoding and decoding does vary enourmously.

Once I had got a decent version of the MPEGMUX all my file sizes decreased and passing a file through VideoRedo (well worth the money) had negligible effect.

It might be that your ATI route and the GBPVR route are different for some reason on your system. This isn't the fault of GBPVR since it doesn't actually do the encoding.
glitch
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 24
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
#4
2006-11-29, 02:18 AM
To Htv, I never said that a file recorded using ATI software and edited for commercials would end up being 1 gigabyte in size. I said that its size would drop 1 gigabyte, not drop to 1 gigabyte.
glitch
Offline

Junior Member

Posts: 24
Threads: 11
Joined: Nov 2006
#5
2006-11-29, 02:20 AM
To Melearp, since I'm using a Hauppauge card with gb-pvr and with the ATI software I was using an ATI card I guess it is the cards that are somehow different if neither software app does the actual encoding (otherwise what is the point in buying a card right?). Does a file that ends up bigger with a Hauppauge mean the Hauppauge card is better than an ATI card (at MPEG encoding at least) or is that not a good indicator?
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  EPG Data source for Germany? Arnes 6 4,370 2010-10-09, 03:13 PM
Last Post: markbb1
  No Data In the Recorded File zb1 5 2,355 2010-08-24, 01:08 AM
Last Post: zb1
  EPG show data showing up in the wrong spot divinehammer 0 1,284 2010-06-24, 09:59 PM
Last Post: divinehammer
  No Radio Times data beyond March 2nd 2010 CureForSanity 11 3,751 2010-03-23, 12:28 PM
Last Post: StevHodge
  Missing TV listings from EPG data gristwooda 9 3,273 2009-12-21, 10:39 PM
Last Post: gristwooda
  What guide data to use? Scott R 3 1,748 2009-11-23, 11:46 PM
Last Post: mccpu
  No Listing Data/ WinTV 980 monty HD 4 2,006 2009-09-03, 11:52 PM
Last Post: sub
  Wrong guide data pcostanza 1 1,243 2009-07-22, 01:00 AM
Last Post: pcostanza
  Lost Data KarlD 3 1,907 2009-07-09, 04:27 PM
Last Post: carpeVideo
  Three channels have no data in EPG adanedhel728 1 1,151 2009-06-24, 12:42 AM
Last Post: adanedhel728

  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread
Forum Jump:

© Designed by D&D, modified by NextPVR - Powered by MyBB

Linear Mode
Threaded Mode